Apple Sued for Blocking Tap-to-Pay Competitors on iPhone - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Apple Sued for Blocking Tap-to-Pay Competitors on iPhone

A proposed class action lawsuit filed against Apple today accuses the company of violating U.S. antitrust law by ensuring that Apple Pay is the only available mobile wallet for making tap-to-pay payments with an iPhone, iPad, or Apple Watch.

Apple Pay Feature
The complaint, filed by law firms Hagens Berman and Sperling & Slater, alleges that Apple is illegally profiting at least $1 billion annually by blocking rivals from accessing NFC technology on its devices, thereby preventing competing services like Google Pay or Samsung Pay from offering tap-to-pay payment functionality on Apple devices.

For every Apple Pay transaction completed with a U.S. issuer's payment card, the issuer must pay Apple a fee of 0.15% for credit cards and half a cent for debit cards, the complaint alleges. By comparison, Google allows multiple mobile wallets on Android smartphones and does not collect a fee from U.S. card issuers for tap-to-pay payments.

"When you compare the functionality of Apple Pay to mobile wallets available on Android devices – Google Pay, Samsung Pay – you're essentially holding up a mirror; they are essentially identical," said Steve Berman, Hagens Berman co-founder and managing partner. "And yet, the same service on Android that card issuers pay absolutely nothing for costs them a collective $1 billion annually through Apple Pay."

Apple would not be able to sustain its "substantial fees" for Apple Pay transactions if the service faced competition on Apple devices, the complaint argues.

Filed in U.S. district court in Northern California, the complaint specifically accuses Apple of multiple violations of the federal Sherman Act by "tying" Apple Pay to its mobile devices and monopolizing the "tap and pay iOS mobile wallet market."

The complaint seeks monetary relief for all U.S. card issuers that paid Apple a fee for any Apple Pay transaction made with any of its payment cards.

Hagens Berman said this is the third time it has sued Apple for antitrust violations. In 2015, the law firm secured a combined $560 million settlement against Apple and publishing companies regarding price fixing of e-books, and earlier this year it secured a $100 million settlement from Apple on behalf of iOS developers who alleged that Apple's then-standard 30% commission on App Store purchases was excessive.

Apple Pay has faced similar scrutiny in other regions, including Australia and Europe. In May, the European Commission informed Apple of its preliminary view that it abused its dominant position in the "mobile wallets on iOS devices" market by limiting access to NFC technology on Apple devices for contactless payments in stores.

The full complaint is available in PDF format on the Hagens Berman website.

Related Roundup: Apple Pay

Popular Stories

iOS 26

iOS 26.4 Adds Two New Features to CarPlay

Tuesday March 24, 2026 1:55 pm PDT by
iOS 26.4 was released today, and it includes a couple of new features for CarPlay: an Ambient Music widget and support for voice-based chatbot apps. To update your iPhone 11 or newer to iOS 26.4, open the Settings app and tap on General → Software Update. CarPlay will automatically offer the new features so long as the iPhone connected to your vehicle is running iOS 26.4 or later....
Apple Business hero

Apple Unveils 'Apple Business' All-in-One Platform

Tuesday March 24, 2026 8:53 am PDT by
Apple today announced Apple Business, a new all-in-one platform that unifies device management, productivity tools, and customer outreach features. The service is designed to be a consolidated replacement for several of Apple's existing business-focused offerings, including Apple Business Essentials, Apple Business Manager, and Apple Business Connect. It provides organizations with a single...
AirPods Pro Firmware Feature

Apple Releases New Firmware for AirPods Pro 3, AirPods Pro 2 and AirPods 4

Tuesday March 24, 2026 12:31 pm PDT by
Apple today released new firmware for the AirPods Pro 2, AirPods Pro 3, and the AirPods 4. The firmware has a version number of 8B39, up from 8B34 on the AirPods Pro 3, 8B28 on the AirPods Pro 2, and 8B21 on the AirPods 4. There is no word on what's included in the firmware, but Apple has a support document with limited notes. Most updates are limited to bug fixes and performance...

Top Rated Comments

ProfessionalFan Avatar
48 months ago
Are you able to use Apple Pay on competitor phones?
Score: 50 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Apple_Robert Avatar
48 months ago

Are you able to use Apple Pay on competitor phones?
Not that I am aware of. I think Apple has every right to only allow Apple Pay on their devices.
Score: 38 Votes (Like | Disagree)
48 months ago
So are the rules going to be no more exclusive features anymore? I admit, the laws surrounding these types of interoperability rules and standards are way out of my league, and I understand some things need to be more "open" and work with each other. But damn, it seems like everyone wants a piece of the Apple pie. It's hard to tell what is a frivolous cash grab and what has merit.
Score: 32 Votes (Like | Disagree)
48 months ago

By comparison, Google allows multiple mobile wallets on Android smartphones and does not collect a fee from U.S. card issuers for tap-to-pay payments.
Because they are hoovering and selling your purchase history.
Score: 29 Votes (Like | Disagree)
NufSaid Avatar
48 months ago
You make an amazing product but are forced to allow your competitors to profit. Ugh....lawyers.

You have a choice - buy an android phone - more people do.
Score: 25 Votes (Like | Disagree)
48 months ago

That's not even a close analogy to what this is about.

Other payment apps are being prevented from accessing the NFC chip to make tap-to-pay payments. Instead, in the case of PayPal, you have to open the PayPal app then have it generate a QR code that you scan. Not as easy and convenient as Apple Pay when you just have to hold your iPhone next to payment terminal.

Let's replaced access to NFC chip with access to the iPhone's camera. What if Apple blocked other apps (Instagram, your banking app that allows for mobile check deposits, etc) from accessing the camera? Would you be okay with that?
I frankly don’t care. I buy a product becuase of what it does. If it doesn’t do what I want it to do I buy something else. I certainly don’t sue a company to try to ensure I get what I want like a self entitled AH. It’s not like other options don’t exist. Don’t try to shoehorn an argument into a situation so it fits a narrative. The simple fact is that if an iPhone and by extension Apple, doesn’t offer what you want, then buy somewhere else.
Score: 21 Votes (Like | Disagree)