Apple Now Spends Over $8 Million Lobbying the EU Annually - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Apple Now Spends Over $8 Million Lobbying the EU Annually

Apple spent more money lobbying EU officials in 2025 than in any previous year, according to a new dataset from Corporate Europe Observatory, which reports that Apple now allocates roughly €7 million ($8.2 million) annually to influence European regulation.

european commission
Apple is identified by the report as one of the ten largest tech-sector lobby spenders in Europe. Those ten companies together account for €49 million of digital-industry lobbying out of a total €151 million recorded in the EU Transparency Register for 2025. Apple previously disclosed spending between €3.5 million and €3.75 million per year in 2021, revealing a near-doubling of declared expenditure within four years.

The report attributes the increase to ongoing EU regulatory activity targeting large American technology firms, including the Digital Markets Act, Digital Services Act, AI Act, and GDPR enforcement. The research notes that Apple participated in 29 formal meetings with high-level European Commission officials between January and June 2025. Amazon recorded 43 meetings in the same window, Microsoft 36, Google 35, and Meta 27.

Artificial intelligence policy was the most frequent topic of Commission-level discussions in the period. According to the meeting minutes, AI was referenced in 58 of the 146 logged meetings with the five largest U.S. tech companies. Other files that Apple and peers lobbied on include data centers and cloud infrastructure (23 meetings), the Digital Services Act (17), the Digital Markets Act (16), and the forthcoming Digital Fairness Act (16).

Apple also engaged with members of the European Parliament. The dataset records 232 meetings between MEPs and the five largest U.S. tech firms in the first six months of 2025. Apple was present at 47 of those interactions. Meta held 63, Amazon 49, Google 47, and Microsoft 34.

Corporate Europe Observatory further attributes €2.3 million of Apple expenditure to consultancy contracts, covering lobbying agencies, PR firms, and third-party research entities. In the same category, Amazon spent €2.84 million and Meta €1.5 million.

Multiple Brussels-based think tanks, including Bruegel, Centre for European Reform, Centre for European Policy Studies, and Centre on Regulation in Europe, now list ongoing financial support from all five U.S. Big Tech firms.

Apple's higher spending comes at a time when EU digital rules are tightening. Its move into the top tier of lobby spenders therefore tracks the fact that Apple now has direct financial and product exposure to every major EU tech issue currently on the table.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Popular Stories

Apple Objects to Keyboard Makers Logo Feature

Apple Wins EU Challenge Over Keyboard Maker's Citrus Logo

Wednesday May 6, 2026 11:48 am PDT by
Apple objected to a European trademark filing from a Chinese keyboard maker because the logo the company wanted to use was too close to Apple's own logo. The EU Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) partially refused to grant a European Union Trade Mark after Apple opposed the filing. The company, Yichun Qinningmeng Electronics Co., makes mechanical keyboards and keycaps, according to its...
Apple Rennweg Switzerland

Apple Plans One of Europe's Biggest Stores in Zurich

Tuesday April 14, 2026 5:42 am PDT by
A building permit filed in Zurich confirms Apple is planning a new retail store at Lintheschergasse 7, near the city's famous Bahnhofstrasse shopping street, with construction set to run through early 2027. The permit, submitted to the city of Zurich in February and reviewed by Swiss Apple publication macprime, explicitly describes the project as a "Bahnhofstrasse Relocation" and includes...
Apple Event Logo

Apple's Next Era Begins September 1

Thursday May 7, 2026 10:36 am PDT by
Apple recently announced that Tim Cook will be stepping down as CEO later this year, after 15 years of leading the company. Effective September 1, Apple's hardware engineering chief John Ternus will become the company's next CEO, while Cook will become executive chairman of Apple's board of directors. In his new role, Apple said Cook will assist with "certain aspects" of the company,...

Top Rated Comments

7 months ago
Lobbying should be completely illegal. It’s wild we allow any company to bribe elected officials.
Score: 36 Votes (Like | Disagree)
7 months ago

Lobbying should be completely illegal. It’s wild we allow any company to bribe elected officials.
Bribery is the exchange of money or favors to influence an official’s decision—illegal almost everywhere. Lobbying is communicating with an elected official to share views or information. When you call or email your representative, you’re lobbying! It can be paid or unpaid, and in most places it’s legal but regulated (e.g., disclosure rules, gift limits, etc.).

If lobbying were illegal: 1) constituents couldn’t contact their representatives, 2) subject-matter experts (including in business, medicine, academia, and advocacy) couldn’t offer input, 3) lawmakers would legislate with less real-world information.

This is why bribery, which corrupts decisions and is banned, but lobbying is not. Lobbying informs decisions and is permitted—within rules—to keep government officials responsive and better-informed.

Edited: To make this a little clearer and to add a personal example.

Some years back I was went with a group of patients and experts (I was one) to visit some representatives in Washington D.C. We were "advocating" for more NIH funding of research into a particular disease/diagnosis. This was a one-time thing and I wasn't paid, but my travel expenses were reimbursed by the organization I was representing. This was lobbying.

I had an opportunity to talk briefly about my research and why more NIH funding could be beneficial. Was this "good" lobbying? It depends on what your view of NIH funding is. Should it increase? If so, then my lobbying was "good". Should it decrease? If so, then my lobbying was "bad". How good or bad it is depends on personal opinion about what's being lobbied for or against.

So maybe only corporations should be banned from having lobbyists? What's the definition of a corporation? What if a government is looking at passing a law or passes a law that harms businesses? Should a business have to go through the legal system after laws are passed and have no other recourse (i.e., a way to prevent 'bad' laws)? What if a law harms both businesses and consumers? Businesses should not be able to contact (lobby) elected officials on behalf of businesses and consumers?

These are not just hypotheticals. This is the nature of lobbying. It ranges from individuals contacting representatives to full-time paid lobbyists. So maybe no paid lobbyists? That limitation comes with its own problems (e.g., only retired or wealthy people could lobby, for example). Banning it would, at least in the United States, potentially be against the First Amendment.
Score: 18 Votes (Like | Disagree)
WarmWinterHat Avatar
7 months ago

Probably because only American tech companies are considered gate keepers on the DMA, there are no EU companies. I think the DSA and AI Act (don’t know as much about these) also heavily focus on limiting American tech. The only broad act that effects everyone equally is the GDPR and all the horrible cookie bars we now have because of it.

I could be wrong though. Maybe there is a non-American company on the DMA gatekeeper list.
Bytedance is a gatekeeper, and is neither American nor European.

Booking.com is a gatekeeper and is a Dutch company.
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
7 months ago

.2% of their 4t company value
You are only off by three orders of magnitude. It is .000225%, roughly the same as the person making $150k spending 34 cents.
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
7 months ago
That’s pennies to Apple. Surprised it isn’t more.
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
7 months ago
Maybe this article is written by an American?

It says: The report attributes the increase to ongoing EU regulatory activity targeting large American technology firms, including the Digital Markets Act, Digital Services Act, AI Act, and GDPR enforcement.

But all those acts and the GDPR enforcement are not only valid for American companies. They are valid for all companies doing business in the EU. Including EU companies.

Sounds like America or American companies are poor poor victims and we should be mad at the EU for being so unfair 😅 Those companies are some of the richest in the world and I can’t really take their fake tears serious.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)