Apple Hit With $634 Million Verdict in Apple Watch Blood Oxygen Patent Lawsuit - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Apple Hit With $634 Million Verdict in Apple Watch Blood Oxygen Patent Lawsuit

A U.S. federal jury has ruled that Apple owes medical technology company Masimo $634 million for patent infringement related to the blood oxygen-sensing technology in the Apple Watch, reports Reuters. Apple will appeal the verdict.

apple watch series 6 blood oxygen monitoring 1
"We are pleased by this outcome, and appreciate the time and attention given to our case by the court and the jury," said Masimo in a press release." This is a significant win in our ongoing efforts to protect our innovations and intellectual property, which is crucial to our ability to develop technology that benefits patients. We remain committed to defending our IP rights moving forward."

"Over the past six years (Masimo has) sued Apple in multiple courts and asserted over 25 patents, the majority of which have been found to be invalid," an Apple spokesperson told Reuters. "The single patent in this case expired in 2022, and is specific to historic patient monitoring technology from decades ago."

The patent dispute led to a ban on U.S. sales of Apple Watch with the blood oxygen feature in December 2023. Apple was able to temporarily continue selling the Apple Watch models while an interim stay was in place during an appeal, but the ban was reinstated as of January 18, 2024, and Apple addressed the issue by immediately launching sales of models with the feature disabled in software.

Apple Watch models in the U.S. remained unable to support blood oxygen monitoring for over a year and a half before Apple introduced a workaround in August 2025 with blood oxygen data being processed and displayed on a paired iPhone rather than on the Apple Watch itself, a change that satisfied U.S. Customs regulators that had been charged with enforcing the original ban.

Apple's workaround did not sit well with Masimo, which filed another lawsuit in an attempt to overturn the U.S. Customs decision and once again prevent Apple from selling Apple Watch models with the blood oxygen feature in the U.S., but there has yet to be a ruling in that lawsuit.

Related Roundup: Apple Watch 11
Buyer's Guide: Apple Watch (Neutral)

Popular Stories

iOS 26

iOS 26.4 Adds Two New Features to CarPlay

Tuesday March 24, 2026 1:55 pm PDT by
iOS 26.4 was released today, and it includes a couple of new features for CarPlay: an Ambient Music widget and support for voice-based chatbot apps. To update your iPhone 11 or newer to iOS 26.4, open the Settings app and tap on General → Software Update. CarPlay will automatically offer the new features so long as the iPhone connected to your vehicle is running iOS 26.4 or later....
Apple Business hero

Apple Unveils 'Apple Business' All-in-One Platform

Tuesday March 24, 2026 8:53 am PDT by
Apple today announced Apple Business, a new all-in-one platform that unifies device management, productivity tools, and customer outreach features. The service is designed to be a consolidated replacement for several of Apple's existing business-focused offerings, including Apple Business Essentials, Apple Business Manager, and Apple Business Connect. It provides organizations with a single...
AirPods Pro Firmware Feature

Apple Releases New Firmware for AirPods Pro 3, AirPods Pro 2 and AirPods 4

Tuesday March 24, 2026 12:31 pm PDT by
Apple today released new firmware for the AirPods Pro 2, AirPods Pro 3, and the AirPods 4. The firmware has a version number of 8B39, up from 8B34 on the AirPods Pro 3, 8B28 on the AirPods Pro 2, and 8B21 on the AirPods 4. There is no word on what's included in the firmware, but Apple has a support document with limited notes. Most updates are limited to bug fixes and performance...

Top Rated Comments

19 weeks ago

Slimy company that deserves nothing. They don't care about human health, just profits from old technology and lawsuits.
Masimo is a real company that has been operating with these kinds of sensors - and more - long before Apple started this kind of monitoring. I was managing introduction of new systems for patient monitoring, which was using sensors from Masimo (among others) at a new hospital just a couple of weeks ago so they're a large, worldwide company in their sector.

Apple was looking into licensing from Masimo, but chose not to. Instead they hired employees away from Masimo and designed something that was close enough to what Masimo had that several instances has sided with them - and Apple failing with their argument "this is a watch, not a patient monitor. Thus we can use what's described in the patents". I dislike patent trolls more than most and has done so for many decades, but this is not one of these.

Of all the IP cases Apple has had, this is one of the very few where I side with the other side.
Score: 48 Votes (Like | Disagree)
19 weeks ago
It would have been a lot cheaper for Apple - and therefore consumers - had they just paid for the licensing fee, like everyone else.
Score: 26 Votes (Like | Disagree)
19 weeks ago

just profits from old technology and lawsuits.
If you don't defend your patents, you lose them.
Score: 15 Votes (Like | Disagree)
19 weeks ago
Couldn’t Apple just buy Masimo for less?
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
19 weeks ago

If you don't defend your patents, you lose them.
That's trademarks, not patents.
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
CWallace Avatar
19 weeks ago

It would have been a lot cheaper for Apple - and therefore consumers - had they just paid for the licensing fee, like everyone else.
Indeed. While I have heard unsubstantiated claims Massimo wanted over $100 per watch, claims based on FRAND patents say this would have been closer to $10-20 per watch.

Evidently this judgement works out to just under $15 per infringing watch.
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)