Tim Cook Might Not Fully Retire After Stepping Down as Apple CEO — Here's Why - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Tim Cook Might Not Fully Retire After Stepping Down as Apple CEO — Here's Why

On Friday, the Financial Times reported that Apple is preparing for Tim Cook to step down as CEO as soon as next year, but he might not fully retire. Instead, it is possible that he will become the next chairman of Apple's board of directors.

Tim Cook MacBook
Apple's current chairman is Arthur D. Levinson, who turned 75 on March 31. Apple has a policy that states that its directors generally may not stand for re-election after age 75, so Levinson has reached that age limit ahead of Apple's next shareholder meeting, which is when he would otherwise be up for re-election next.

Here is the exact wording of the policy, from Apple's Corporate Governance Guidelines:

A director may not stand for re-election after age 75, but need not resign until the end of his or her term.

Apple is unlikely to name a new CEO before its next earnings report in late January, according to the Financial Times, but it said an announcement could happen early in the year. That timeframe — after January but still early in the year — would align with Apple's annual shareholder meeting, which is typically held in late February or early March.

There is one potential wrinkle: Apple typically releases the proxy materials for a shareholder meeting in mid-January, and that filing would need to indicate that Cook is up for election as chairman. That would be before Apple's next earnings report in late January, so the specific timing of how this might all play out remains to be seen.

If this theory does prove to be accurate, Apple could announce that Levinson is leaving the board due to the age policy, and that Cook will succeed him as chairman. Apple would likely say this move was part of its long-planned succession plan.

At 65, Cook could serve as chairman for up to a decade, before the age policy applies to himself.

In this scenario, it is unclear if Cook would become chairman or executive chairman. In the former role, he would focus more on managing the board and corporate governance. In the latter role, Cook would remain more involved in Apple's day-to-day operations and decision-making, which could help to ease the transition to a new CEO.

Apple's Senior Vice President of Hardware Engineering, John Ternus, is widely viewed as Cook's most likely successor when the time comes.

Daring Fireball's John Gruber and some other commentators have speculated that Apple may have intentionally fed the information about Cook preparing to step down to the Financial Times, so that the actual announcement and the timing of it does not come as a complete surprise to investors and the general public.

Cook has been CEO since August 2011, so he is nearing 15 years at the helm of the company.

This is only one possibility for Apple's succession plans. Alternatively, the company could opt to exempt Levinson from the age policy, as it did for now-77-year-old director Ron Sugar last year. Apple could also elect someone other than Cook as chairman. However, with Cook having reached the typical retirement age of 65, and Levinson having reached the policy age of 75, the stars might align for Cook to become Apple's next chairman.

Top Rated Comments

19 weeks ago

what a sad run of a CEO. Sure apple made a bunch of money, but the magic is gone. nothing pushing the boundaries or inspiring. Just safe, small, incremental updates.
To be fair, the Apple Silicon transition was not a small incremental upgrade. Apple made it look easy but that was a monumental decade-long effort that should be applauded. Tim tried to pull a Steve with the AVP, and to a lesser extent the Apple Car Project Titan. Unfortunately, no one was able to replicate Steve’s magic. It isn’t fair to say that Tim didn’t try, or that he only stuck with small incremental upgrades.

The MacBook Pro and entire Mac lineup for that matter is arguably better today than at any point in Apple’s history including under Steve. The Apple Watch and AirPods are both multi-billion dollar class-leading companies on their own. But there is some truth that Tim’s approach was more focused on incremental upgrades and certainly emphasized growing Apple’s services revenue, and did so very successfully.
Score: 25 Votes (Like | Disagree)
19 weeks ago

If he fully stepped down, perhaps Scott Forstall as CEO?
Scott Forstall? You might want to check the label on whatever it is that you are smoking and titrate the dosage.

Seriously, Apple needs a diplomat and logistics expert at the helm. I'm not saying that is what I, as a customer, want Apple to have. As a customer, I always want the CEO to be a 'product guy' or a 'software gal'. But that just doesn't move Apple's needle (and it is a BIG needle to move).

Realistically (and financially), Apple's secret sauce has been as much in supply chain as it has been in products. And for that, Tim Cook has been superb.
Score: 14 Votes (Like | Disagree)
BabyBoii Avatar
19 weeks ago
what a sad run of a CEO. Sure apple made a bunch of money, but the magic is gone. nothing pushing the boundaries or inspiring. Just safe, small, incremental updates.
Score: 14 Votes (Like | Disagree)
19 weeks ago
I would be shocked if Cook didn't become the chair of Apple.

He's the person who lead apple to be a $4tn company and knows it inside out.

Investors would be super spooked if TC left for the beach.
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
AF_APPLETALK Avatar
19 weeks ago

True. Apple undeniably did a lot better after “Steve” was gone.
Have they? At what cost?



Attachment Image

Attachment Image
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
iMac The Knife Avatar
19 weeks ago
Cook: Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in!
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)