Apple Clings to Samsung as RAM Prices Soar - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Apple Clings to Samsung as RAM Prices Soar

Apple is significantly increasing its reliance on Samsung for iPhone memory as component prices surge, according to The Korea Economic Daily.

iPhone Chips
Apple is said to be expanding the share of iPhone memory it sources from Samsung due to rapidly rising memory prices. The shift is expected to result in Samsung supplying roughly 60% to 70% of the low-power DRAM used in the iPhone 17, compared with a more even split with SK Hynix in previous generations, with Micron also participating as a smaller supplier.

The change is occurring against a backdrop of tightening supply in the global memory market. The iPhone relies on low-power double data rate memory (LPDDR), which is optimized for energy efficiency and thermal performance in mobile devices. While Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron all manufacture LPDDR at scale, industry sources report that SK Hynix and Micron have increasingly redirected production capacity toward high-bandwidth memory (HBM), which is in high demand for artificial intelligence accelerators and data center hardware. As a result, their available capacity for mobile-focused LPDDR has become heavily constrained.

By contrast, Samsung has apparently maintained substantial production of general-purpose and mobile DRAM, allowing it to meet Apple's requirement for extremely large and predictable volumes. Samsung is said to be the only company that can meet Apple's conditions in a situation where SK Hynix seems to be focused on HBM.

According to the report, Apple's hardware is particularly sensitive to momentary voltage spikes, which are not well accommodated by its latest chips, including the A19 and A19 Pro. This places additional pressure on memory suppliers to deliver components that perform identically across very large production runs.

The price of a 12GB LPDDR5X module, the likes of which are used in the iPhone Air and iPhone 17 Pro, has risen sharply from around $30 at the beginning of 2025 to roughly $70 today. Apple's scale and long-standing practice of negotiating multi-year supply agreements typically provide some insulation from short-term price volatility, but the magnitude of the increase has made supplier reliability and volume commitments more important. Concentrating a much larger share of orders with Samsung should allow Apple to secure more predictable deliveries and potentially benefit from economies of scale, even as overall component costs rise.

Tag: Samsung

Popular Stories

galaxy fold 7 orange

Samsung's U.S. Price Increases Add to Concerns About Rising Apple Device Costs

Tuesday April 14, 2026 2:47 pm PDT by
Samsung raised the prices of several of its smartphones and tablets in the United States overnight, likely due to increasing costs caused by ongoing memory shortages. As shared by PhoneArena, the 512GB Galaxy Z Flip increased by $80 from $1,219.99 to $1,299.99, while the S25 Edge and S25 FE went up $80 and $40, respectively. Samsung did not increase the cost of its current-generation S26...
tsmc semiconductor chip inspection 678x452

Apple Eyes Intel and Samsung as Backup US Chipmakers

Tuesday May 5, 2026 2:32 am PDT by
Apple has held "exploratory" talks with Intel and Samsung about manufacturing the main processors for its devices in the United States, reports Bloomberg ($). Apple is said to have had early-stage talks with Intel about using its chipmaking services, while Apple executives have reportedly visited a Samsung plant under construction in Texas that will also make advanced chips. The talks are ...
iPhone 18 Pro with a smaller centered Dynamic Island

iPhone 18 Pro's LTPO+ Display Upgrade to Come From Samsung, LG

Wednesday May 6, 2026 5:38 am PDT by
Apple is expected to finalize OLED panel approvals for the iPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max this month, with Samsung Display and LG Display likely to dominate panel supply, reports The Elec. This year, China's BOE has reportedly been closed out of the premium tier supply chain, despite having landed some panel orders for the iPhone 17 Pro models. The setback is said to be down to quality and...

Top Rated Comments

AndyUnderscoreR Avatar
20 weeks ago
The sooner the AI bubble bursts, the better.
Score: 64 Votes (Like | Disagree)
20 weeks ago
Modern “AI” damages everything it touches :/
Score: 45 Votes (Like | Disagree)
WarmWinterHat Avatar
20 weeks ago

You, uh, havent looked at RAM prices recently, huh? Triple or quadruple those price estimates. Apple’s memory upgrade prices, for like the first time ever, actually are reasonably priced
Apple's prices aren't suddenly reasonable; the entire market is unreasonable. If you need a new computer, buy it now, otherwise sit it out. Try again in a year or two; the bottom will fall out.

The entire AI market can get bent.
Score: 20 Votes (Like | Disagree)
cateye Avatar
20 weeks ago

Eventually a company so vertically integrated like Apple will have to build their own fabs. Real men have fabs, like Jerry Sanders used to say. Their reliance on TSMC and Samsung is economically unsound.
Fabs are eye-wateringly expensive to build and difficult to run. The reason there are so few of them is because they only work due to economies of scale—serving the needs of many customers, not just one, and the ability to shift both customers and methods as markets require. Apple owning its own fabs would allow none of this.

Apple's entire structure as a company is based on outsourcing of manufacture. Choosing literally the most fraught and expensive possible thing to in-source is not based in any kind of economic, practical, or business reality.
Score: 16 Votes (Like | Disagree)
WarmWinterHat Avatar
20 weeks ago

It’s crazy but based on what I’ve seen from Apple over the last few years every major component in their products will be manufactured by them.

We’re already seeing this with the C1/C1x and N1 chips.
They are fabed by other companies. Apple doesn’t manufacture any of their components.
Score: 16 Votes (Like | Disagree)
20 weeks ago
No company manages supply chain better than Apple.
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)