Apple Subpoenas Samsung in South Korea Over DOJ Antitrust Case - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Apple Subpoenas Samsung in South Korea Over DOJ Antitrust Case

Apple has asked a U.S. court to formally request internal Samsung documents from South Korea as part of discovery in the DOJ's ongoing antitrust lawsuit against the company.

Apple Logo 16x9 US Flag Feature
The DOJ filed suit against Apple in March 2024, alongside a number of governments, alleging the company used App Store rules, developer restrictions, and control over key iPhone features to stifle competition. After Apple's bid to have the case dismissed failed, the litigation moved into discovery.

Samsung is central to the case. All four complaints identify Samsung as Apple's "closest smartphone competitor," and plaintiffs allege that Apple's conduct caused Samsung to stop making smartwatches that connect to iPhone in 2021. Apple subpoenaed Samsung's U.S. subsidiary, Samsung Electronics America, for documents, but the subsidiary declined to produce any records, arguing the materials are held solely by its South Korean parent. Apple says Samsung America lodged that objection 65 times across its responses.

In a memorandum filed on April 7, Apple asked the court to issue a formal letter of request under the Hague Evidence Convention, an international mechanism that allows civil proceedings to seek documents from foreign entities. The request targets market research, sales data, financial statements, and consumer switching analyses from Samsung's smartphone and wearables divisions, as well as Galaxy Store developer agreements and documents relating to Samsung Pay, messaging apps, and super apps.

Apple pointed specifically to Smart Switch, Samsung's tool for transferring content from iPhone to a Samsung device, as evidence that the company holds directly relevant data on consumer switching behavior. The filing also seeks Samsung's own documents on its digital wallet fees, after plaintiffs alleged Apple charges banks 0.15% per Apple Pay transaction while Samsung charges nothing comparable.

Even if the court grants the motion, South Korean authorities would independently decide whether to comply, and Samsung Electronics could raise objections under Korean law.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Top Rated Comments

jlc1978 Avatar
31 minutes ago at 05:14 am

"Biting the hand that feeds you" comes to mind. Apple depends crucially on Samsung.
And Samsung depends on Apple as well. Smart companies don't take this personally, it's just part of doing business. In this case, it isn't Samsung suing Apple, but government agencies suing.
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)
50 minutes ago at 04:55 am

"Biting the hand that feeds you" comes to mind. Apple depends crucially on Samsung.
Apple and Samsung have had legal issues with each other for years. They still conduct a lot of business with each other. This suit hasn't changed that and won't change that.

Also, Apple isn't allowed to defend itself in court? Samsung has access to internal Apple data through subpoena. When Apple asks for similar data from Samsung, the company hides behind technicalities of international law. They are welcome to do that, but Apple's lawyers should have the same access to data to build their case that Samsung's lawyers have from Apple.
Score: 3 Votes (Like | Disagree)
chars1ub0w Avatar
1 hour ago at 04:44 am
"Biting the hand that feeds you" comes to mind. Apple depends crucially on Samsung.
Score: 3 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Happy_John Avatar
22 minutes ago at 05:24 am

A little clarification -- this is Apple defending itself against a lawsuit.
Yes, despite how it could be framed, this ISN'T Apple vs Samsung. It's Big Corporation vs DOJ.
Score: 2 Votes (Like | Disagree)
51 minutes ago at 04:55 am
Good luck with that one Apple... might also want to remember as stated above, Samsung IS a rather important key supplier of yours...
Score: 2 Votes (Like | Disagree)
surferfb Avatar
30 minutes ago at 05:16 am
Seems to be a lot of confusion in the comments. Apple isn’t suing Samsung. Apple is trying to get Samsung to turn over documents to help Apple’s defense, which is needed because, as the article states, the impact of Apple’s actions on Samsung is central to the government’s case against Apple.
Score: 1 Votes (Like | Disagree)