Apple Planning to Change 30/70 Pricing Formula for In-App Media Subscriptions - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Apple Planning to Change 30/70 Pricing Formula for In-App Media Subscriptions

appstoreApple is planning to alter its pricing formula for subscriptions in a major change that will benefit subscription-based apps and services like Netflix, Spotify, Hulu, and more, reports Financial Times. Apple is said to be considering changing the 30 percent fee that it currently charges and is discussing new commercial terms with media companies.

At the current point in time, all apps and in-app subscriptions work on a 30/70 split. Apple gets 30 percent of what's paid for an app or service, while the company or developer offering the app gets a 70 percent cut. That means when someone purchases Netflix through the Netflix iOS app, Apple gets over $2 of the fee paid. At the same time, Apple has disallowed direct links to outside subscription sign up services within apps, ensuring it gets its fee.

Apple's 30 percent subscription cut has been a sticking point for many companies, especially those with tight margins like music services, and it's gotten Apple into hot water in the past, most notably during the e-book price fixing case levied against it by the U.S. Department of Justice.

According to the Financial Times, changing the App Store subscription terms could make Apple devices more appealing to content creators while also lessening potential pressure from regulators.

Changing the App Store's terms of trade could improve the economics of online content businesses and reassure regulators that the company is not abusing its position as gatekeeper to one of the world's most lucrative digital marketplaces.

On the Apple TV, Apple is already offering a more generous split, taking just 15 percent of revenue generated from subscription services like the recently released HBO Now.

There are no specifics on the terms that Apple is potentially considering for companies that offer subscription services, but it appears that the price cuts at this time will not extend to standalone apps.

Popular Stories

iOS App Store General Feature Desaturated

Apple Removes Freecash App From App Store After Months of Data Harvesting

Tuesday April 14, 2026 3:54 pm PDT by
Apple removed scam app Freecash from the App Store this week after the app spent months harvesting data from iPhone users, reports TechCrunch. Freecash reached the number two spot on the U.S. App Store charts in January after being heavily marketed on TikTok. It promised users up to $35 per hour for watching TikTok content, but it was collecting swaths of user data. Back in January, Wired...
grok logo purple gradient

Apple Threatened to Pull Grok From App Store Over Sexualized Images

Wednesday April 15, 2026 7:10 am PDT by
Apple privately warned Elon Musk's xAI company in January that it would remove the Grok app from the App Store unless the company put a stop to the chatbot's nude and sexualized deepfakes, according to a letter Apple sent to U.S. senators and obtained by NBC News ($). Earlier this year, Grok's AI capabilities came under scrutiny after X users shared nonconsensual sexualized images of women...
iOS App Store General Feature Dock

Apple Quietly Tweaked the iOS App Store App – Here's What's Changed

Friday April 17, 2026 2:32 am PDT by
No, you aren't going crazy – Apple has quietly made a backend change to the App Store app in iOS that switches the location of the Updates tab and renames it to make it more prominent. In the App Store app, you can see the change by tapping your profile picture in the top-right corner. The "Apps & Purchase History" tab used to be at the top the list, but it has switched places with...

Top Rated Comments

AngerDanger Avatar
143 months ago
This should really be between the developers and Apple. Why does this need to be public information? It's not going to stop me from purchasing my apps one way or another.
If you find yourself unsatisfied with any information obtained on MR, simply returned the unused portions for a full refund. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Score: 25 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Crosscreek Avatar
143 months ago
Gwad, I hope Apple doesn't go broke doing this.
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
SgtPepper12 Avatar
143 months ago
This should really be between the developers and Apple. Why does this need to be public information? It's not going to stop me from purchasing my apps one way or another.
This is one of the weirdest things I've ever read on these forums. I don't even know where to start.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
143 months ago
This is one of the weirdest things I've ever read on these forums. I don't even know where to start.
A challenger appears!
So how about 0%, what they deserve for services that run completely independently from them?
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
143 months ago
This should really be between the developers and Apple. Why does this need to be public information? It's not going to stop me from purchasing my apps one way or another.
Yeah because developers don't use MacRumors...
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
furi0usbee Avatar
143 months ago
This should really be between the developers and Apple. Why does this need to be public information? It's not going to stop me from purchasing my apps one way or another.
??? Why would this information need to be private?
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)