Security Researcher Shows How Remote macOS Exploit Hoodwinks Safari Users With Custom URL Schemes - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Security Researcher Shows How Remote macOS Exploit Hoodwinks Safari Users With Custom URL Schemes

by

A security researcher has demonstrated how macOS users are vulnerable to remote infection through a malicious exploit involving the "Do you want to allow..." popup that can be encountered when visiting websites in Safari.

In a lengthy breakdown, Patrick Wardle explains how the exploit utilizes document handlers, which request permission to open a link or a file in another app – like a PDF in Preview, for example – and URL handlers, which work similarly in the way they notify macOS that they can accept certain file formats.

malicious attack safari
The exploit occurs when a user visits a malicious website and a ZIP file is downloaded and automatically unzipped by Safari, whereby the custom URL scheme is initially registered on the user's filesystem.

Once the target visits our malicious website, we trigger the download of an archive (.zip) file that contains our malicious application. If the Mac user is using Safari, the archive will be automatically unzipped, as Apple thinks it's wise to automatically open "safe" files. This fact is paramount, as it means the malicious application (vs. just a compressed zip archive) will now be on the user's filesystem, which will trigger the registration of any custom URL scheme handlers! Thanks Apple!

In the next stage, the malicious web page runs code that can load or "browse" to the custom URL scheme, which causes macOS to activate the URL handler and launch the malicious application.

This action is enabled through the Safari user prompt that includes options to "Allow" or "Cancel" the process, however the popup text and available options are controlled by the attacker, and are therefore easily changed to trick or deceive the user.

malicious exploit safari
The standard defenses built into macOS – Gatekeeper, for example – are said to be ineffective when it comes to the attack described above, and while Apple could always revoke the malicious app's signature, that course of action would obviously be too late for anyone who had already gone ahead and launched it.

Until then, turning off automatic unzipping of "safe" files should be enough to prevent the malicious procedure from ever occurring. Concerned users can do so by clicking the Safari menu bar, selecting Preferences..., and under the General tab, unchecking Open "safe" files after downloading.

Top Rated Comments

Kebabselector Avatar
99 months ago
Until then, turning off automatic unzipping of "safe" files should be enough to prevent the malicious procedure from ever occurring. Concerned users can do so by clicking the Safari menu bar, selecting Preferences..., and under the General tab, unchecking Open "safe" files after downloading.
Surely this should be the default position for any user regardless of the exploit or not.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
99 months ago
There have been a few previous security vulnerabilities relating to Safari on the Mac, where allowing Safari to open 'safe' files was the entry vector.

Ever since the first such vulnerability, it's been my opinion that the safest approach is to simply leave that option turned off permanently. Particularly as it doesn't really add much convenience. I very rarely want to open a file as soon as it's been downloaded. Also, opening a file manually involves two clicks at the very most.

Anyway, I feel this is one instance where security outweighs convenience by a very wide margin.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Porco Avatar
99 months ago
I have always turned this option off for any mac I worked with. It should never have been a thing, and certainly never the default.
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
twistedpixel8 Avatar
99 months ago
Surely this should be the default position for any user regardless of the exploit or not.
It shouldn’t even be a feature. How lazy do you have to be if you can’t double click an archive?!
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Justanotherfanboy Avatar
99 months ago
His snarky “thanks Apple!” comment seemed a bit unprofessional for a security researcher.
Surely he must be aware that all tech companies don’t try to have security holes... & if none existed whatsoever, he’d be out of a job.
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
MrGimper Avatar
99 months ago
I only came here to doff my cap for the use of the word "hoodwinks"
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)

Popular Stories

iOS 26

iOS 26.4 Adds Two New Features to CarPlay

Tuesday March 24, 2026 1:55 pm PDT by
iOS 26.4 was released today, and it includes a couple of new features for CarPlay: an Ambient Music widget and support for voice-based chatbot apps. To update your iPhone 11 or newer to iOS 26.4, open the Settings app and tap on General → Software Update. CarPlay will automatically offer the new features so long as the iPhone connected to your vehicle is running iOS 26.4 or later....
Apple Business hero

Apple Unveils 'Apple Business' All-in-One Platform

Tuesday March 24, 2026 8:53 am PDT by
Apple today announced Apple Business, a new all-in-one platform that unifies device management, productivity tools, and customer outreach features. The service is designed to be a consolidated replacement for several of Apple's existing business-focused offerings, including Apple Business Essentials, Apple Business Manager, and Apple Business Connect. It provides organizations with a single...
AirPods Pro Firmware Feature

Apple Releases New Firmware for AirPods Pro 3, AirPods Pro 2 and AirPods 4

Tuesday March 24, 2026 12:31 pm PDT by
Apple today released new firmware for the AirPods Pro 2, AirPods Pro 3, and the AirPods 4. The firmware has a version number of 8B39, up from 8B34 on the AirPods Pro 3, 8B28 on the AirPods Pro 2, and 8B21 on the AirPods 4. There is no word on what's included in the firmware, but Apple has a support document with limited notes. Most updates are limited to bug fixes and performance...