U.S. Supreme Court Appears 'Open' to Allowing App Store Monopoly Lawsuit vs. Apple to Proceed - MacRumors
Skip to Content

U.S. Supreme Court Appears 'Open' to Allowing App Store Monopoly Lawsuit vs. Apple to Proceed

U.S. Supreme Court justices "appeared open" to letting a proposed class-action lawsuit proceed against Apple that accuses the company of operating an illegal App Store monopoly, according to Reuters.

app store monopoly
The lawsuit was filed in 2011 by a group of iPhone users who believe Apple violates federal antitrust laws by requiring apps to be sold through its App Store, where it collects a 30 percent commission from all purchases, leading to inflated prices as developers pass on the cost of the commission to customers.

The bottom line is that the iPhone users, led by Chicago resident Robert Pepper, believe that apps would be priced lower outside of the App Store, as Apple's 30 percent cut would not be baked in to prices.

The lawsuit was initially dismissed in 2013 by a California district court, due to errors in the complaint, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit revived the case in 2017. Apple appealed with the Supreme Court, which will rule whether the case should proceed after hearing an hour of arguments today.

From the start, Apple has argued that it doesn't set prices for paid apps, and that charging a 30 percent commission on the distribution of paid apps and in-app purchases does not violate antitrust laws in the United States. Last year, the U.S. Department of Justice filed an amicus brief in support of Apple.

The plaintiffs, meanwhile, are backed by 30 state attorneys general, including those representing Texas, California, and New York. The Supreme Court is expected to make its ruling by June 2019.

Popular Stories

iOS App Store General Feature Desaturated

Apple Removes Freecash App From App Store After Months of Data Harvesting

Tuesday April 14, 2026 3:54 pm PDT by
Apple removed scam app Freecash from the App Store this week after the app spent months harvesting data from iPhone users, reports TechCrunch. Freecash reached the number two spot on the U.S. App Store charts in January after being heavily marketed on TikTok. It promised users up to $35 per hour for watching TikTok content, but it was collecting swaths of user data. Back in January, Wired...
grok logo purple gradient

Apple Threatened to Pull Grok From App Store Over Sexualized Images

Wednesday April 15, 2026 7:10 am PDT by
Apple privately warned Elon Musk's xAI company in January that it would remove the Grok app from the App Store unless the company put a stop to the chatbot's nude and sexualized deepfakes, according to a letter Apple sent to U.S. senators and obtained by NBC News ($). Earlier this year, Grok's AI capabilities came under scrutiny after X users shared nonconsensual sexualized images of women...
iOS App Store General Feature Dock

Apple Quietly Tweaked the iOS App Store App – Here's What's Changed

Friday April 17, 2026 2:32 am PDT by
No, you aren't going crazy – Apple has quietly made a backend change to the App Store app in iOS that switches the location of the Updates tab and renames it to make it more prominent. In the App Store app, you can see the change by tapping your profile picture in the top-right corner. The "Apps & Purchase History" tab used to be at the top the list, but it has switched places with...

Top Rated Comments

jonblatho Avatar
97 months ago
Alternate headline:

People with Little or No Understanding of Technology Demonstrate Little or No Understanding of Technology
Score: 49 Votes (Like | Disagree)
JeffPerrin Avatar
97 months ago
Basis of this case is so opposite of what actually happened: the race to the bottom in terms of app pricing.

And for those wondering, some of what Apple's 30% pays for for devs:

- Credit card transactions (incl. associated fees)
- Managing sales tax - local and international (!!!)
- Distribution (server and bandwidth costs)
- Sales and installation analytics
Score: 39 Votes (Like | Disagree)
jclardy Avatar
97 months ago
That 30% commission is pretty hefty but allowing apps to be sold outside the appstore and installed on iPhones without being jailbroken would pretty much ruin the edge Apple has on security and privacy it would seem.
I disagree. Just make it like macOS where you have to explicitly allow unsigned code to run on your computer. And leave it off by default.
Score: 34 Votes (Like | Disagree)
97 months ago
That 30% commission is pretty hefty but allowing apps to be sold outside the appstore and installed on iPhones without being jailbroken would pretty much ruin the edge Apple has on security and privacy it would seem.
Score: 29 Votes (Like | Disagree)
97 months ago
As an app developer, all I can say is that the App Store is a win/win situation for developers and Apple. I also don't think the customer is impacted negatively in any way. The App Store offers assurances on some level that the apps are checked and monitored to be free from malware and they have a singular purchase and billing source and way to manage all their apps. Prices are hardly over-inflated, in fact software/app prices are at all-time lows. I would also argue that the law suit was filed a bit over 8 years ago and is now starting to proceed... Timing on this is now awkward and the suit needs to be updated drastically or dropped altogether. Google has the same "monopoly" with their store as well. If anyone wants to go after illicit software practices or App Store shenanigans of sorts, they need to take a look at the in-app purchase models being used by many developers. Some of these are quite predatory and targeted at kids.

FWIW, as most of my app development is corporate in nature, I have to say that not everything must be distributed through the App Store. There are enterprise deployment options. While this doesn't change things for Joe Consumer, it does mean that when a company hires me to create an app for internal use, we can develop, test and deploy internally without ever touching the App Store and I can turn the app over to them at the end of the contract where they can continue to administer and deploy as they see fit.

Ultimately I see this suit going nowhere. SCOTUS has historically sided with multiple companies accused of the same sort of monopoly. Apple created the platform, they created their ecosystem and there are other alternatives out there. Apple has already won a similar suit regarding iTunes music distribution and AT&T and Verizon have both won similar suits in the past with their own services and music offerings (although on a much smaller scale) before smartphones/ iPhone came along.

And if this suit progresses through, then we as a collective society may as well file suit against Microsoft, Google, Sony, Nintendo, and so on... As they all have their "app stores" for various devices or systems. I can't just download any app/game I want and run it on my Nintendo Switch -- nope, got to get it from the eShop. PlayStation Store? Yep. Xbox Live? Yep.
Score: 19 Votes (Like | Disagree)
killr_b Avatar
97 months ago
cue the thread full of people who think less freedom is a good thing
Score: 18 Votes (Like | Disagree)