Epic Wins Appeal to Continue Antitrust Case Against Apple in Australia

Australia's Federal Court has permitted Epic Games to sue Apple, reversing a previous ruling that said the two companies had to battle it out in the United States first before any legal action could take place Down Under.

app store blue banner epic 1
Epic and Apple are involved in a highly public lawsuit in the United States, but Epic has also sued Apple in other countries, including Australia last November, in an attempt to boost its chances of getting a favorable ruling.

Epic's case in Australia follows much of the same argument in the U.S., claiming that Apple is a monopoly and that the ‌App Store‌ and in-app purchasing system are unfair.

Apple argued that the case was already being tried in California courts, and won a three-month stay on the Australian action that would become permanent unless Epic filed a lawsuit in California alleging violations of Australian Consumer Law.

Epic appealed that decision in April, and on Friday morning three Federal Court judges duly granted it, finding that the presiding judge who permitted the stay of action had failed to consider that the lawsuit involves public interest issues, which take priority over exclusive jurisdictional stipulations. Epic said it was pleased with the outcome.

"This is a positive step forward for Australian consumers and developers, who are entitled to fair access and competitive pricing across mobile app stores," the company said in a statement. "We look forward to continuing our fight for increased competition in app distribution and payment processing in Australia and around the world."

Apple said it would appeal the decision, on grounds that its contract with Epic requires that the two companies litigate in California.

"The initial decision in April from Australia's Federal Court correctly ruled that Epic should be held to the agreement it made to resolve disputes in California," said Apple in a statement. "We respectfully disagree with the ruling made today and plan to appeal."

Apple in March told an Australian court that Epic's legal challenge against the ‌App Store‌ is "self-serving," and that all the software company aims to do is "redefine the terms of access" that it's always been subject to on Apple's platforms.

The three-week ‌Epic Games‌ v. Apple trial wrapped up in the States in late May, but it could be several weeks before we learn of the verdict, and it's quite likely that any decision will be appealed, so this is a lawsuit that could carry on for months to come both in the U.S. and abroad.

(Via The Australian Financial Review.)

Popular Stories

maxresdefault

Apple Shows Off a Key Reason to Upgrade to the iPhone 17

Saturday February 7, 2026 9:26 am PST by
Apple today shared an ad that shows how the upgraded Center Stage front camera on the latest iPhones improves the process of taking a group selfie. "Watch how the new front facing camera on iPhone 17 Pro takes group selfies that automatically expand and rotate as more people come into frame," says Apple. While the ad is focused on the iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro Max, the regular iPhone...
Finder Siri Feature

Why Apple's iOS 26.4 Siri Upgrade Will Be Bigger Than Originally Promised

Friday February 6, 2026 3:06 pm PST by
In the iOS 26.4 update that's coming this spring, Apple will introduce a new version of Siri that's going to overhaul how we interact with the personal assistant and what it's able to do. The iOS 26.4 version of Siri won't work like ChatGPT or Claude, but it will rely on large language models (LLMs) and has been updated from the ground up. Upgraded Architecture The next-generation...
wwdc sans text feature

Apple Rumored to Announce New Product on February 19

Thursday February 5, 2026 12:22 pm PST by
Apple plans to announce the iPhone 17e on Thursday, February 19, according to Macwelt, the German equivalent of Macworld. The report, citing industry sources, is available in English on Macworld. Apple announced the iPhone 16e on Wednesday, February 19 last year, so the iPhone 17e would be unveiled exactly one year later if this rumor is accurate. It is quite uncommon for Apple to unveil...
apple wallet drivers license feature iPhone 15 pro

Apple Says These 7 U.S. States Plan to Offer iPhone Driver's Licenses

Monday February 9, 2026 6:24 am PST by
In select U.S. states, residents can add their driver's license or state ID to the Apple Wallet app on the iPhone and Apple Watch, and then use it to display proof of identity or age at select airports and businesses, and in select apps. The feature is currently available in 13 U.S. states and Puerto Rico, and it is expected to launch in at least seven more in the future. To set up the...
14 inch MacBook Pro Keyboard

New MacBook Pros Could Now Arrive in March

Sunday February 8, 2026 6:02 am PST by
New MacBook Pro models with the M5 Pro and M5 Max chips could arrive as soon as Monday, March 2, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. In today's "Power On" newsletter, Gurman said that the release of new MacBook Pro models is tied to the release of macOS Tahoe 26.3. The launch is said to be slated for as early as the week of March 2. He added that the M4 Pro and M4 Max models on sale today...

Top Rated Comments

iOS Geek Avatar
60 months ago

If epic win , you can still choose not to sideload

It's time to let apple be open
If you want "open"...I'm going to drag out the same tired repetitive statement...you have another option. People are all about having a "choice" but forcing Apple to open...TAKES AWAY THAT CHOICE! Many of us chose Apple because it's closed and we didn't want "open" Android. Force Apple to open and now your choices are "open" or... "open". That's not a choice.

You already have an "open" choice. For **** sake, stop trying to take away the only "closed" one for those of us who want it. The level of irony is astounding. In the hope to provide "choice" you actually want to take it away.
Score: 15 Votes (Like | Disagree)
mymacrumorsname Avatar
60 months ago

Loving it! ? Governments are finally waking up, and will beat the hell out of these shady companies like Apple and Google.
I’m looking forward to side loading.
What would be the advantage to that, to side loading? Or in other words, why do you want / need that?
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Kirkster Avatar
60 months ago
The only winners are the lawyers.

If you want to sideload the latest spyware/malware from China, Russia, Nigeria, etc there is already a device for that, Knock yourselves out.

I don’t mind paying for apps that fit my needs, but I am loath to be the product, that seems to be the current business model of Google, Facebook, Microsoft, and many others.

I find value in the walled garden that is the App Store. Do they catch every bad actor? No one ever will, but they do a better job of protecting their user base than most. Nothing is perfect but I like the steps that apple has been taking for security and privacy far more that the other manufacturer where you are their product.
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Absolute Trainwreck Avatar
60 months ago

It’s not whatever though. Your sister, well she decided to sideload apps and got a really nasty one. Now all your info that was in her phone, your location, your text, your photos, oh yeah don’t forget that 20 dollars you texted her with Apple Pay… welp now that bad app has all your info and broke your Apple Pay security.
And you didn’t even have to side load an app. ?
Someone has no idea how software works lmao
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
SurferPup Avatar
60 months ago
I'm one Aussie that Epic Failure and Aussie Torment Office (our version of your IRS) will make no money from the sale of their games in or outside of the App Store. I hope Epic financially haemorhrage fatally here. Our stupid Government should stay out of what is essentially an American legal court battle.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
RavynArcadia Avatar
60 months ago

Parler!

I don’t want Apple to tell me which app can or can’t be installed.
I wouldn’t call parler being usable via sideloading an advantage.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)