Android Phones With Qualcomm Modems Top iPhone 16e in New 5G Test - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Android Phones With Qualcomm Modems Top iPhone 16e in New 5G Test

A new Cellular Insights report commissioned by Qualcomm has found that two unnamed Android smartphone models equipped with Qualcomm's Snapdragon X75 and Snapdragon X80 modems achieved faster 5G speeds compared to the iPhone 16e, which is equipped with Apple's first-ever, custom-designed C1 modem.

Apple iPhone 16e C1 Feature
Testing was conducted with T-Mobile's sub-6GHz 5G network in New York City, across a variety of real-world environments, according to Cellular Insights.

The report found that the Android devices "consistently outperformed" the iPhone 16e in terms of 5G connectivity, especially indoors. Specifically, the Android devices achieved up to 35% faster download speeds compared to the iPhone 16e, and up to 91% faster upload speeds. The report also found that the iPhone 16e frequently became hot to the touch during testing, but it could not confirm if this directly impacted performance.

The two Android smartphones were priced at $619 and $799 in the U.S., the report said, while the iPhone 16e starts at $599.

Based on its findings, Cellular Insights concluded that the Qualcomm-powered devices "hold a clear edge" over the iPhone 16e for individuals seeking "consistent, high-throughput 5G performance." Qualcomm's PR department is now touting the favorable results, which they relayed to us in an email sent earlier today.

The full report is available as a PDF.

Apple's C1 modem achieved equal to faster performance than some Qualcomm modems in some earlier tests, but a Qualcomm spokesperson said this study is the "only comprehensive, scientific" comparison completed on a U.S. network so far.

Performance is not the only metric that matters for a smartphone modem, with power efficiency also being an important factor. Apple has advertised the C1 modem as being the most power-efficient iPhone modem ever, which contributes to the iPhone 16e offering the longest battery life of any 6.1-inch iPhone model ever. With its next-generation C2 and C3 modems, Apple hopes to continue to close the gap on the performance front.

Tags: C1, Qualcomm
Related Forum: iPhone

Popular Stories

iOS 26

iOS 26.4 Adds Two New Features to CarPlay

Tuesday March 24, 2026 1:55 pm PDT by
iOS 26.4 was released today, and it includes a couple of new features for CarPlay: an Ambient Music widget and support for voice-based chatbot apps. To update your iPhone 11 or newer to iOS 26.4, open the Settings app and tap on General → Software Update. CarPlay will automatically offer the new features so long as the iPhone connected to your vehicle is running iOS 26.4 or later....
Apple Business hero

Apple Unveils 'Apple Business' All-in-One Platform

Tuesday March 24, 2026 8:53 am PDT by
Apple today announced Apple Business, a new all-in-one platform that unifies device management, productivity tools, and customer outreach features. The service is designed to be a consolidated replacement for several of Apple's existing business-focused offerings, including Apple Business Essentials, Apple Business Manager, and Apple Business Connect. It provides organizations with a single...
AirPods Pro Firmware Feature

Apple Releases New Firmware for AirPods Pro 3, AirPods Pro 2 and AirPods 4

Tuesday March 24, 2026 12:31 pm PDT by
Apple today released new firmware for the AirPods Pro 2, AirPods Pro 3, and the AirPods 4. The firmware has a version number of 8B39, up from 8B34 on the AirPods Pro 3, 8B28 on the AirPods Pro 2, and 8B21 on the AirPods 4. There is no word on what's included in the firmware, but Apple has a support document with limited notes. Most updates are limited to bug fixes and performance...

Top Rated Comments

11 months ago
Oh really? A company that's been doing radio chips for decades is going to outperform the company that just dipped its toes into radio chips?
Score: 33 Votes (Like | Disagree)
11 months ago

If this is not yet mm wave but C1 modem already lost, how much more when tested using mm wave?
Does it really matter?
MMWave is barely available outside of some stadiums and college campuses, and as far as I know, has never been available on an iPhone outside of the US.
Score: 20 Votes (Like | Disagree)
11 months ago
Apple's focus was power efficiency, not speed (and to not have to pay licensing fees)

"C1 is the first modem designed by Apple and the most power-efficient modem ever on an iPhone, delivering fast and reliable 5G cellular connectivity. Apple silicon — including C1 — the all-new internal design, and the advanced power management of iOS 18 all contribute to extraordinary battery life"

I haven't seen anything official from Apple claiming the C1 was faster, and didn't put it in the Flagship phones (yet at least)
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Gengar Avatar
11 months ago
The C1 only supports 3X carrier aggregation, so it's not surprising it's being outperformed by Qualcomm modems on T-Mobile's network, when T-Mobile has widely deployed 4X Carrier Aggregation (normally n71, n25, and two channels of n41) and will be rolling out 5X carrier aggregation in areas they have c-band/n77.

The C1 performed well on AT&T and Verizon because they mostly have 3 or fewer channels being aggregated (AT&T usually has n5 and two channels of n77, while Verizon usually has two channels of n77).

The study even says they couldn't confirm (on page 4) if the iPhone supported 4X carrier aggregation like the Qualcomm modems, but it's widely known that it doesn't ('https://www.ookla.com/articles/apples-c1-modem-early-adopters').
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
AppleFan91 Avatar
11 months ago

A new Cellular Insights report ('https://cellularinsights.com/comparative-5g-performance-report-android-smartphones-vs-iphone-16e/') commissioned by Qualcomm has found that two unnamed…
Not that I am disputing the results on this, but I feel like this at least raises questions regarding the objectivity of this test…
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
klasma Avatar
11 months ago

It's all over Columbus.
He died over 500 years ago, though.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)