WhatsApp Backs Apple in Legal Fight Against UK Encryption Demands - MacRumors
Skip to Content

WhatsApp Backs Apple in Legal Fight Against UK Encryption Demands

WhatsApp plans to support Apple in its ongoing legal battle with the UK Home Office over user data privacy, the messaging platform's boss Will Cathcart has told the BBC.

iCloud Versus UK Key Feature
The Meta-owned service warned that the case "could set a dangerous precedent" by encouraging other governments to demand access to encrypted communications.

Apple launched legal action after receiving a secret government notice earlier this year demanding backdoor access to encrypted iCloud data worldwide. The UK used its Investigatory Powers Act to require Apple to compromise its Advanced Data Protection feature, which encrypts user photos, notes, messages, and device backups.

Rather than comply, Apple pulled the encryption feature from UK users entirely in February.

"WhatsApp would challenge any law or government request that seeks to weaken the encryption of our services," Cathcart said. The company vowed to continue defending users' "right to a private conversation online."

The encryption controversy has drawn criticism from American politicians, with some calling it a "dangerous attack on US cybersecurity." Tulsi Gabbard, director of US National Intelligence, described the UK's demands as an "egregious violation" of US citizens' privacy.

A UK court rejected the government's attempt to keep details of Apple's legal challenge secret. Judges ruled that conducting hearings entirely in private would be "truly extraordinary."

The Home Office has defended its position, saying the government's "first priority" is keeping people safe while protecting privacy. Officials argue the powers help investigate serious crimes including terrorism and child abuse.

Apple maintains that creating backdoors would inevitably compromise security for all users, making them vulnerable to malicious actors.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Popular Stories

iOS 26

iOS 26.4 Adds Two New Features to CarPlay

Tuesday March 24, 2026 1:55 pm PDT by
iOS 26.4 was released today, and it includes a couple of new features for CarPlay: an Ambient Music widget and support for voice-based chatbot apps. To update your iPhone 11 or newer to iOS 26.4, open the Settings app and tap on General → Software Update. CarPlay will automatically offer the new features so long as the iPhone connected to your vehicle is running iOS 26.4 or later....
Apple Business hero

Apple Unveils 'Apple Business' All-in-One Platform

Tuesday March 24, 2026 8:53 am PDT by
Apple today announced Apple Business, a new all-in-one platform that unifies device management, productivity tools, and customer outreach features. The service is designed to be a consolidated replacement for several of Apple's existing business-focused offerings, including Apple Business Essentials, Apple Business Manager, and Apple Business Connect. It provides organizations with a single...
AirPods Pro Firmware Feature

Apple Releases New Firmware for AirPods Pro 3, AirPods Pro 2 and AirPods 4

Tuesday March 24, 2026 12:31 pm PDT by
Apple today released new firmware for the AirPods Pro 2, AirPods Pro 3, and the AirPods 4. The firmware has a version number of 8B39, up from 8B34 on the AirPods Pro 3, 8B28 on the AirPods Pro 2, and 8B21 on the AirPods 4. There is no word on what's included in the firmware, but Apple has a support document with limited notes. Most updates are limited to bug fixes and performance...

Top Rated Comments

Joseph C Avatar
10 months ago

If you're not guilty of committing a crime (and don't plan on doing so), why get so worked up about this? Are we so paranoid as to believe that a worker at the Home Office is going to randomly access a person's messages for a laugh? We have the least amount of privacy ever; a person can literally walk down the road and record videos of you without you even knowing, then share it online where it will be forever available - but I'm not going to Hogwarts to rob the invisible cloak.
"Ultimately, arguing that you don't care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don't care about free speech because you have nothing to say."
Score: 35 Votes (Like | Disagree)
10 months ago

If you're not guilty of committing a crime (and don't plan on doing so), why get so worked up about this?
Literally the sentence every single totalitarian regime in the world has used throughout history to justify mass and intrusive surveillance of its population.

I am not British myself, but I find it truly sad that some people can resort to the same justification of mass surveillance without realising what the eventual implications are, in the country of George Orwell who saw and brilliantly exposed those issues decades ago.
Score: 31 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Moonjumper Avatar
10 months ago

If you're not guilty of committing a crime (and don't plan on doing so), why get so worked up about this? Are we so paranoid as to believe that a worker at the Home Office is going to randomly access a person's messages for a laugh? We have the least amount of privacy ever; a person can literally walk down the road and record videos of you without you even knowing, then share it online where it will be forever available - but I'm not going to Hogwarts to rob the invisible cloak.
Because it requires a backdoor. Once there is a backdoor, others will find a way in, such as criminals.
Score: 26 Votes (Like | Disagree)
cjsuk Avatar
10 months ago

If you're not guilty of committing a crime (and don't plan on doing so), why get so worked up about this? Are we so paranoid as to believe that a worker at the Home Office is going to randomly access a person's messages for a laugh? We have the least amount of privacy ever; a person can literally walk down the road and record videos of you without you even knowing, then share it online where it will be forever available - but I'm not going to Hogwarts to rob the invisible cloak.
Well say you're gay. Then they record all your conversations, because they can. Then they make being gay illegal. Then you're ****ed. That's why.
Score: 18 Votes (Like | Disagree)
SpaceMagic Avatar
10 months ago
To people who think "I have nothing to hide, so why is this a problem", just remember that the following things were once illegal, and still are in several countries worldwide:


* interracial marriage
* same sex relationships
* protest
* cohabitation without marriage
* alcohol
* tattoos
* dancing
* accessing foreign media
* forming unions
* women working certain professions
* cannabis
* caffeine
* birth control
* travel without a man
* teaching about evolution
* reading certain books
* speaking certain languages
* and many many more

So you may think you have nothing to hide today, but who knows what you'll have to hide tomorrow.

We all want certain crimes to be pursued and prosecuted (terrorism / abuse of minors / etc), but there are a multitude of other ways these acts can be uncovered or, better, prevented (let's start with educational and health inequality, a rethinking of the way we design housing and communities, financial inequalities...). Do we want the rights of all to be eroded due to the acts (albeit sometimes heinous) of very, very few.
Score: 17 Votes (Like | Disagree)
10 months ago

If you're not guilty of committing a crime (and don't plan on doing so), why get so worked up about this? Are we so paranoid as to believe that a worker at the Home Office is going to randomly access a person's messages for a laugh? We have the least amount of privacy ever; a person can literally walk down the road and record videos of you without you even knowing, then share it online where it will be forever available - but I'm not going to Hogwarts to rob the invisible cloak.
So thought the German Jews in the 1920s when their religious views were registered. A decade later, being Jewish was punishable by death.

Especially with what we’re seeing in the states currently, this topic should not be up for debate 😬

Learn from history - or be bound to repeat it!
Score: 17 Votes (Like | Disagree)