Apple Asks Indian Court to Block Antitrust Law Allowing $38 Billion Fine - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Apple Asks Indian Court to Block Antitrust Law Allowing $38 Billion Fine

Apple is fighting an antitrust penalty law in India that could require it to pay massive fines in its ongoing antitrust dispute with Tinder owner Match, reports Reuters.

apple india
Last year, India passed a law that allows the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to use global turnover when calculating penalties imposed on companies for abusing market dominance. Apple can be fined up to 10 percent, which would result in a penalty of around $38 billion. Apple said that using global turnover would result in a fine that's "manifestly arbitrary, unconstitutional, grossly disproportionate, and unjust."

Apple is asking India's Delhi High Court to declare the law illegal, suggesting that penalties should be based on the Indian revenue of the specific unit that violates antitrust law.

Apple has been fighting an antitrust lawsuit in India since 2022 against dating app Match and several Indian startups. The CCI released a pair of reports last year suggesting that Apple had engaged in "abusive conduct and practices" because it required developers to use its in-app purchase system. The CCI was forced to recall its investigative reports because they contained confidential information about Apple's business practices, resulting in a delay of several months. No final decision has been made, and a penalty has yet to be levied against Apple. Apple maintains that it has not done anything wrong, and argues that it has a very small share of the smartphone market in India because Android devices are much more popular.

Apple said in today's filing that the CCI used the new penalty law on November 10 in an unrelated case, fining a company for a violation that happened 10 years ago. Apple said it had "no choice but to bring this constitutional challenge now" to avoid having retrospective penalties applied against it, too.

Match has argued that a high fine based on global turnover would discourage companies from repeating antitrust violations. Apple's plea will be heard on December 3.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Popular Stories

iOS 26

iOS 26.4 Adds Two New Features to CarPlay

Tuesday March 24, 2026 1:55 pm PDT by
iOS 26.4 was released today, and it includes a couple of new features for CarPlay: an Ambient Music widget and support for voice-based chatbot apps. To update your iPhone 11 or newer to iOS 26.4, open the Settings app and tap on General → Software Update. CarPlay will automatically offer the new features so long as the iPhone connected to your vehicle is running iOS 26.4 or later....
Apple Business hero

Apple Unveils 'Apple Business' All-in-One Platform

Tuesday March 24, 2026 8:53 am PDT by
Apple today announced Apple Business, a new all-in-one platform that unifies device management, productivity tools, and customer outreach features. The service is designed to be a consolidated replacement for several of Apple's existing business-focused offerings, including Apple Business Essentials, Apple Business Manager, and Apple Business Connect. It provides organizations with a single...
AirPods Pro Firmware Feature

Apple Releases New Firmware for AirPods Pro 3, AirPods Pro 2 and AirPods 4

Tuesday March 24, 2026 12:31 pm PDT by
Apple today released new firmware for the AirPods Pro 2, AirPods Pro 3, and the AirPods 4. The firmware has a version number of 8B39, up from 8B34 on the AirPods Pro 3, 8B28 on the AirPods Pro 2, and 8B21 on the AirPods 4. There is no word on what's included in the firmware, but Apple has a support document with limited notes. Most updates are limited to bug fixes and performance...

Top Rated Comments

SFjohn Avatar
17 weeks ago
It seems every country is looking to fine Apple 10% of its worldwide income, they pass laws tailored to go after Apple. Find them infringing the law they wrote, and voila: a golden ticket for instant multi billionaire income. 😂
Score: 29 Votes (Like | Disagree)
sw1tcher Avatar
17 weeks ago
Maybe Tim Cook should try this first?



Attachment Image
Score: 19 Votes (Like | Disagree)
ipedro Avatar
17 weeks ago

Yes, it’s been that way with my computers for 30 years, without issue.
"without issue"...



Yeah, just computers plagued with viruses, everyone having to have a designated geek family member who can fix their computer after installing rogue apps that install crap all over the system that they can't get rid of, and "developer" being synonymous with "broke".

The concept of millionaire developers outside of mega corporations, that came along with the App Store, which is why it's become so wildly successful and ubiquitous. Being able to trust that an app won't spy on you or break your device or misuse your credit card number after you purchase a niche app — that sense of security is new. Not needing to be your entire family's resident geek, also new.

People seem to have selective memory of the "good old days".

Attachment Image
Score: 14 Votes (Like | Disagree)
17 weeks ago
It's Apple's ecosystem. If you don't like it as developer, don't develop for it. Why do "all these alternavive app store builders" even get government protection? If I want to open a physical store, does the government fine the existing chains?
Score: 14 Votes (Like | Disagree)
sw1tcher Avatar
17 weeks ago

So you want a ‘wild west’ where if what you put on your phone is untested and you have no comeback, rather than a system that prevents this? Mmm.
I want to be able to get iOS apps like I can macOS apps without restriction or Apple telling me what's acceptable. If macOS is a scary "wild west" then why do you use a Mac?
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
17 weeks ago

I hope Apple keeps losing massively until the anticompetitive behavior stops.
What anticompetitive behavior is that? The one where made-up rules targeting Apple but leaving local home-grown businesses doing the exact same things exempt?
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)