Apple's Google Gemini Deal Could Be Worth $5 Billion - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Apple's Google Gemini Deal Could Be Worth $5 Billion

Apple's newly announced partnership with Google to use Gemini models for Siri and Apple Intelligence could be worth as much as $5 billion, according to one analyst's estimate.

Gemini Siri Feature
The deal is structured as a cloud computing contract that will see Apple pay "several billion dollars to Google over time," according to the Financial Times (paywalled), citing a person familiar with the agreement. Gene Munster at Deepwater Asset Management puts the value at $5 billion for Google.

The arrangement is reminiscent of a deal made two decades ago that made Google's search engine the default on Apple devices, which grew to be worth about $20 billion annually to Apple.

Apple said it determined that Google's technology provides the "most capable foundation" for its Apple Foundation Models. However, the Gemini partnership raises questions about the future of Apple's existing ChatGPT integration, which has been part of Apple Intelligence since 2024. Apple said the Google deal does not affect the ChatGPT integration, but Munster expressed skepticism about its long-term prospects.

"I think that the ChatGPT integration is going to die on the vine... having two large models, given the economies of scale, wouldn't make a ton of sense for Apple," he told FT.

A person close to OpenAI told the newspaper that the company had taken "a conscious decision to not become the custom model provider for Apple" last autumn to focus on building its own AI device. That hardware effort is being led by former Apple design chief Jony Ive, who was hired by OpenAI in May 2024 – a move Munster suggested may have soured Apple on a deeper OpenAI partnership.

Despite the $5 billion figure, Apple's Gemini deal is comparatively conservative compared to other companies' AI infrastructure spending. Google, Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta have all committed hundreds of billions of dollars to new AI data centers since ChatGPT launched in 2022, but Apple has kept its investment in physical infrastructure at roughly 3 percent of revenue, according to FT's analysis.

For fiscal 2025, Apple's spending on property, plant, and equipment was $12.7 billion. Compare that to the roughly $90 billion Google is expected to spend this year. One former Apple executive told the FT that the Google deal was "a necessary byproduct of Apple's decision not to 'go big' on its AI investments like its competitors."

The next-generation version of Siri is expected to be introduced with iOS 26.4, which will likely be released to the general public in March or April.

Popular Stories

iOS 26

iOS 26.4 Adds Two New Features to CarPlay

Tuesday March 24, 2026 1:55 pm PDT by
iOS 26.4 was released today, and it includes a couple of new features for CarPlay: an Ambient Music widget and support for voice-based chatbot apps. To update your iPhone 11 or newer to iOS 26.4, open the Settings app and tap on General → Software Update. CarPlay will automatically offer the new features so long as the iPhone connected to your vehicle is running iOS 26.4 or later....
Apple Business hero

Apple Unveils 'Apple Business' All-in-One Platform

Tuesday March 24, 2026 8:53 am PDT by
Apple today announced Apple Business, a new all-in-one platform that unifies device management, productivity tools, and customer outreach features. The service is designed to be a consolidated replacement for several of Apple's existing business-focused offerings, including Apple Business Essentials, Apple Business Manager, and Apple Business Connect. It provides organizations with a single...
AirPods Pro Firmware Feature

Apple Releases New Firmware for AirPods Pro 3, AirPods Pro 2 and AirPods 4

Tuesday March 24, 2026 12:31 pm PDT by
Apple today released new firmware for the AirPods Pro 2, AirPods Pro 3, and the AirPods 4. The firmware has a version number of 8B39, up from 8B34 on the AirPods Pro 3, 8B28 on the AirPods Pro 2, and 8B21 on the AirPods 4. There is no word on what's included in the firmware, but Apple has a support document with limited notes. Most updates are limited to bug fixes and performance...

Top Rated Comments

Return Zero Avatar
10 weeks ago
As long as this is based on the same model as Gemini, but completely run on Apple-controlled hardware and unable to communicate with Google, I am 100% OK with this implementation. It'd be the same concept as running a local DeepSeek model... sure it was made by a Chinese company, but if it's not sending any data back to them, who cares? Your iPhone itself was made in China anyway. No matter the model you always have to be aware of bias, hallucinations, censorship, etc. That just comes with the territory.

For selective searching like they have now, I can't stand that we are forced to use chatGPT or nothing. Give us choice where we can have it, and privacy where we can't.
Score: 17 Votes (Like | Disagree)
antiprotest Avatar
10 weeks ago
Even with an LLM handed right to them, Apple might mess this one up too.
Score: 16 Votes (Like | Disagree)
10 weeks ago
Disappointed to hear that Apple has partnered with that company. With all the information they have collected and are collecting, I let you to imagine what it could do to human mankind.
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
code-m Avatar
10 weeks ago

Isn't Gemini also suppose to be a stop gap until Apple get's its own LLM up to snuff?

Or perhaps Tim realizes how far they are behind and given up that approach.
It would cost Apple more than $5 Billion to make Siri capable, this is the most financially sound decision.
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Ursadorable Avatar
10 weeks ago
Don't care how much it's worth. I don't want anything Google on my device(s). In terms of worst tech companies in the industry, Google is the most exploitive next to Microsoft. I specifically bought into the Apple ecosystem so I didn't have to deal with Google.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
rp2011 Avatar
10 weeks ago
The best solution for Apple. A lot of people me included called for this exact scenario 2 years ago. Apple does not need a consumer facing LLM or chatbot. Anyone can access their favorite version at a touch of a button and why would they want burn through $100's of billions on something that 1- no one is clamoring for, 2- Are not ready for Prime time, and 3- sucks $100's of billions of dollars from companies without generating anything in return. There is no ROI and the technology is not fully baked yet.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)